- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:06:50 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 13.01.2023 12:03, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, > "HTTP Semantics". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7306 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> > > Section: 14.1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > ranges-specifier = range-unit "=" range-set > range-set = 1#range-spec > range-spec = int-range > / suffix-range > / other-range > > Corrected Text > -------------- > ranges-specifier = range-unit "=" OWS range-set > range-set = 1#range-spec > range-spec = int-range > / suffix-range > / other-range > > Notes > ----- > The ABNF is inconistent with one of the examples given in 14.1.2 > > bytes= 0-999, 4500-5499, -1000 > > The bug in the ABNF was likely introduced when converting away from "implied linear whitespace". > > See also <https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1070#issuecomment-1361800123>. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HTTP Semantics > Publication Date : June 2022 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : INTERNET STANDARD > Source : HTTP > Area : Applications and Real-Time > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG I don't see any subsequent discussion, but I believe this is an actual erratum and should be set to "verified". Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 23 October 2023 05:07:12 UTC