- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:46:48 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- Mark Nottingham writes: > In doing so, you necessarily have to handle failure in one or more of > those service calls. ESI, for example, allows you to use a backup URL or > text (depending on whose extensions you're using) to paper over the > problem.[6] That makes the response complete, and it serves that client > as best as it can, but you wouldn't want to cache the result for reuse. Not to mention assembling all the tracking set-cookies from all the included items. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 5 February 2021 07:47:01 UTC