- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:40:45 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- CC: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "William Chan (³ÂÖDzý)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I would agree with this view. In fact, many of the arguments I have seen are explicitly not for personal gain but due to practical, legal, or other considerations that are not tied to personal gain in any way. Thanks, Henrik -----Original Message----- From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 10:30 AM To: Mike Belshe Cc: Nicolas Mailhot; "William Chan (³ÂÖDzý)"; ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: multiplexing -- don't do it In message <CABaLYCvwn79PQE-p4ov15XT4yhELsazikOwon6EYwZsdzUkNSA@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >Once again - the people arguing against encryption are the people that >want to exploit the user's data transmission stream for their own personal gain. Sorry Mike, but this totally black/white view doesn't work. As I said earlier, there are users who are not legally allowed to have end-to-end privacy, prison-inmates, children, employees etc. You may disagree with these policies and/or their underlying rationales, but if you make HTTP/2.0 incompatible with them, you will just slow HTTP/2.0 deployment. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 17:41:25 UTC