W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > June 2001

RE: Scheduling for London

From: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:58:29 -0400
Message-ID: <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D01878077@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
To: discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf-whois@imc.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:47 PM
> To: Dave Crocker; Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
> Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org; ietf-whois@imc.org; brunner@nic-naa.net
> Subject: Re: Scheduling for London 

> But, as Dave says, this is not a walk in the park. Significant work is
> needed before a meeting will be fruitful.

How relevant do folks see the work previously agreed to within ICANN circles
to prescribe the info that must be returned in response to a domain name
query?  Good building block, or still too muddled to form the basis of
something to work from?

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 17:08:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:12 UTC