W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Scheduling for London

From: Shane Kerr <shane@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:25:21 +0200
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf-whois@imc.org
Message-ID: <20010621182518.A949@penguin.ripe.net>
On 2001-06-20 16:58:29 -0400, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:47 PM
> > To: Dave Crocker; Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
> > Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org; ietf-whois@imc.org; brunner@nic-naa.net
> > Subject: Re: Scheduling for London 
> > But, as Dave says, this is not a walk in the park. Significant work
> > is needed before a meeting will be fruitful.
> How relevant do folks see the work previously agreed to within ICANN
> circles to prescribe the info that must be returned in response to a
> domain name query?  Good building block, or still too muddled to form
> the basis of something to work from?

While I may not be "relevant", could you please point me and any other
folks who might not be part of the ICANN circles to some place we could
find out what the info that must be returned is?

(FWIW, while the RIPE NCC is an RIR, we do domain name queries on the


Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 12:26:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:12 UTC