I was about to incorporate the resolution to issue 221[1] when I noticed an inconsistency: We say that a sender MUST NOT send a message containing Processing Instructions. However, for receivers we only say SHOULD detect PIs and generate a fault. In the case of an intermediary ( the case we were thinking of when we said 'SHOULD' for receivers ) this will not work, as the intermediary is also a sender. Therefore, in order to comply with the MUST it has to detect PIs in the inbound message, otherwise when it sends the message onward, it might be violating the MUST. On balance I think the best we can get away with is SHOULD NOT Gudge [1] http:///lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Aug/0014.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 05:42:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 October 2006 00:08:53 GMT