W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2002

RE: Problem with resolution of Issue 221

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:57:07 -0400
To: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7F85A8A2.8DDCAA2E-ON85256C1E.00707BF3@lotus.com>

My strong feeling is that intermediaries should not be required to do PI 
checking in situations where performance makes such detection a problem. I 
agree with Gudge that requiring it for one purpose but not another misses 
the point.  So, if the resolution to 221 seems inconsistent when viewed 
from that perspective, then I think we need to get the WG to clarify.  My 
recollection was that our intention was that detection and rejection in a 
receiver was to be on a best effort basis, but I could be wrong.  Thanks.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 17:57:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC