Agenda, 8 April 2004 WS Desc telcon

Remember the time change [.1]

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
      Ingo Melzer, Jeff Mischkinsky, Bijan Parsia, Allen Brookes, 
      Jerry Thrasher, David Booth, Asir Vedamuthu, Glen Daniels, 
      Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes:
  - April 1st telcon [.1].
  
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0001.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1].
?         2003-09-18: Marsh to review the QA operational
                      guidelines.
?         2004-01-08: Pauld to write up examples of schemas for the
                      Primer.
?         2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for 
                      test suite.
?         2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch 
                      HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks 
                      that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
?         2004-03-05: DavidO to notify TAG about our decision on safety.
DONE [.2] 2004-03-11: JMarsh, David Booth, David Orchard to form adhoc 
                      group to explore stylistic rendering options.
?         2004-03-25: Hugo to look at the Handling Privacy in WSDL 
                      2.0 for issues against our spec.
DONE [.3] 2004-03-25: Paul to review the XML Schema PER (by next week).
PENDING   2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
DONE [.4] 2004-04-01: Youenn to create a specific proposal for
describing 
                      the HTTP version.
?         2004-04-01: Editors to update SOAP 1.2 Strawman proposal to
take 
                      Part 1 changes into account.
DONE [.5] 2004-04-01: Youenn to provide editors specific text about 
                      https: uris
DONE [.6] 2004-04-01: Marsh to contact Mark Baker and see if @method 
                      satisfies him.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0000.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0012.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0011.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0002.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  a. Upcoming FTFs
     - May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
       May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM 
         (possible task force meetings in the afternoon)
       May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
       Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1]
       Registration open [.2]
     - August 2-4 [.3] (London)
       Logistics, Registration to open shortly.
  b. Charter renewal - everyone needs to be reappointed [.4]
  c. Handling Privacy [.5] review
  d. Schema second edition [.6] review

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-05-f2f.htm
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/WSD0405/
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Feb/0033.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/0119.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0204.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
5.  Task Force Status.
 a. Properties and Features (dormant)
 b. Patterns (dormant)
 c. Attributes (dormant)
 d. Media type description
 e. QA & Testing
  - Response to comments on QA Spec Guidelines [.2]
  - Implement QA Operational guidelines? [.3]
 f. Schema versioning
  - Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0086.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Sep/0074.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Sep/0023.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
6.  New Issues.  Issues list [.1].
  - none

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html

------------------------------------------------------------------ 
7.  Effort to simplify our spec.
  - DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Indicating HTTP version (related to Issue 164 [.1])
  - Youenn's proposal for describing the HTTP version [.2].

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x164
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0012.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
9.  Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
  - Youenn suggests specific text about https: uris [.2]
  - See also issue 56 [.3]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165 
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0011.html
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x56

------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 64 [.1] Operations as HTTP verbs (Mark Baker) [.2, .3, .4]
  - Jacek's synthesis [.5].
  - Awaiting description from Philippe showing how properties or
    extensions can be used to annotate the WSDL with RESTful 
    properties.  Ask Mark for a definitive list of those properties 
    so we can consider how to associate them with property URIs or 
    namespaces.
  - Does the current draft [.6] with "method" attribute address this
    issue?  Not completely, Mark [.7] and DavidO [.8] reply.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x64
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0103.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0111.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0094.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0095.html
[.6]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings.
html#_http
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0002.html
[.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0004.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [.1]
  - Is this a subset of issue 64?

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54

------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 55: Define binding to HTTP headers [.1]
  - Do we want such capability?

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x55

------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 147: HTTP binding uses static content-type header [.1]
  - "... we can today describe operations using messages 
    consisting in XHTML or SVG documents. Using the HTTP binding, 
    these messages will have the "application/xml" mime type 
    while it would be more appropriate to use more precise mime 
    types ("application/xhtml+xml" or "image/svg+xml" for
    instance). Therefore, it might be good to be able to set the 
    mime type to use for a given message, at least at the HTTP 
    binding level ..."

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x147

------------------------------------------------------------------
14.  SOAP 1.2 Binding
  - Review Jean-Jacques' schema [.1] outlining an overall approach to
    the binding.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0295.html

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 14:27:21 UTC