W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2003

[Rev 1] Agenda: 12-14 May 2003 WS Description WG FTF

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:32:40 -0700
Message-ID: <1113DDB24D4A2841951BFDF86665EE19061A6492@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>

[Second draft - suggestions still welcome!]

Logistics [1], dial-in numbers [2] (members only).

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fMayLogistics.htm
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fMayLogistics.htm#Bridge

--------------------------------------------------------
Monday 12 May
--------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Introductions and logistics
    - Assignment of scribes
      Jeff Mischkinsky, Umit Yalcinalp, Steve White, 
      Jean-Jacques Moreau, Adi Sakala, Steve Lind, 
      William Vambenepe, Igor Sedukhin, Youenn Fablet, 
      Sandeep Kumar, Sandeep Weerawarana

09:15 Publication plan
      June Working Drafts (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)

09:30 WSDL 1.1 binding for SOAP 1.1 [3].
    - Do we envision a need for separate bindings for SOAP 1.1 and
      SOAP 1.2, or do we think a parameterized binding is best?

  [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0002.html

10:30 Break
10:50 Proposal for restricting a service to a single interface [4].

  [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0069.html

12:30 Lunch
13:30 Proposal for restricting a service to a single interface (cont.)

14:30 Multiple endpoints with the same interface [5]

  [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0052.html

15:00 Break
15:20 Describing endpoint references [6].
      R085 and XML Base [7]

  [6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20
03-04-22.html
  [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0142.html

17:30 Adjourn

-------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday 13 May
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Properties and features TF report
    - Usage scenarios: presentation of simple feature use 
      (S1 simple feature [10]). Glen will provide the example.
    - Go over the list of pros and cons: [11]
    - Glen will illustrate more on how the ability to have a 
      generic context by using properties will be useful for 
      simplifying WSDL processor and their extensions.

 [10]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~//2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-pftf-usa
ge-scenarios.html#S1
 [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0016.html

10:30 Break
10:50 Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [12].
    - Jean-Jacques proposal at [13].
    - Jacek's addendum at [14].
    - Proposal from Glen at [15], fix from JJM at [16].  Undecided on
      whether to allow WSDL 1.1 syntax, PnF syntax, or both.
    - Waiting for guidelines from PnF TF.
    - Alternate (?) proposal from JJM to allow arbitrary setting of HTTP
      header fields [17]
    - Is "FnP for HTTP binding and SOAP HTTP binding" [18] a friendly
      amendment or an alternative proposal?

 [12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2 
 [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0050.html 
 [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Sep/0056.html 
 [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0010.html 
 [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0022.html 
 [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0028.html
 [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0025.html

12:30 Lunch
13:30 Issues 53-55 [19]
    - Philippe's proposal for HTTP binding [20].
      Generally accepted.  Philippe will continue to polish the 
      Proposal for discussion at the FTF, after which we expect to 
      roll it into the spec.

 [19]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#
x53 
 [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0068.html 

15:00 Break
15:20 Patterns
    - Waiting on framing of the issue by the Patterns task force.
    - Soliciting rationale for each pattern [21]

 [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0016.html 

17:00 Adjourn
      Group dinner in Saint-Malo [22].

 [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html

-------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 14 May
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 BindingType proposal from Kevin [30].  Updated proposal at [31].
    Sanjiva's alternative at [32].
    Awaiting updated proposal from Sanjiva.

 [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Aug/0009.html 
 [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html 
 [32]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/att-0117/01-bind
ings-2002-07-24.html 

10:30 Break
10:50 BindingType (cont.)

12:30 Lunch
13:30 Begin Joint Session with WS Architecture
      Future meetings
      IBM/Toronto            Arch: July 38-30, Desc: July 30-1 August
    ? SAP/Palo Alto          Desc: Sept 22-24, Arch: Sept 24-26
    ? Fujitsu/San Francisco  Desc: Nov 3-5,    Arch: Nov 5-7

13:40 (WSDesc) Single interface per service implications on
      (WSArch) "What is a web service?"

14:00 OWL Presentation and Demo on OWL, its value in the Web Service 
      space, its relation to RDF and the RDF mapping WS Desc is
      chartered to produce, and its relation to properties and
      features.  [Bijan Parsia]

15:30 End Joint Session
      Adjourn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Issues held for future meetings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  Moving MIME Type Information to the Interface [.1]
    Awaiting proposal from Philippe.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0028.html 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Removing message.  Umit's posting on the value of part as an
    abstract concept of WSDL [.1].  Sanjiva asks for more rationale
    as to why his proposal did not fly [.2], and suggests that
    inheritance and overloading go together [.3].  Roberto's original
    proposal at [.4].  Direction suggested by Dale [.5]

    Postponed until we have a little better idea of what our bindings
    will look like.  Gudge's responses [.6, .7] to Umit's examples [.8]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0011.html 
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0020.html 
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0014.html 
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Nov/0035.html 
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Dec/0040.html 
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0006.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0013.html 
[.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0005.html 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:32:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:24 GMT