W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2003

RE: [Rev 1] Agenda: 12-14 May 2003 WS Description WG FTF

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 15:33:27 -0600
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405A9609C@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org, w3c-ws-arch@w3.org
Cc: fallside@us.ibm.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Cc: Bijan Parsia
> Subject: [Rev 1] Agenda: 12-14 May 2003 WS Description WG FTF

 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday 14 May
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 13:30 Begin Joint Session with WS Architecture
>       Future meetings
>       IBM/Toronto            Arch: July 38-30, Desc: July 30-1 August
>     ? SAP/Palo Alto          Desc: Sept 22-24, Arch: Sept 24-26
>     ? Fujitsu/San Francisco  Desc: Nov 3-5,    Arch: Nov 5-7
> 
> 13:40 (WSDesc) Single interface per service implications on
>       (WSArch) "What is a web service?"
> 
> 14:00 OWL Presentation and Demo on OWL, its value in the Web Service 
>       space, its relation to RDF and the RDF mapping WS Desc is
>       chartered to produce, and its relation to properties and
>       features.  [Bijan Parsia]

This is not *exactly* WSA business, but [wearing my XMLP member hat] I took
at action item on today's XMLP telcon to follow up on David Fallside's
inquiry 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2003May/0008.html
and ask your collective help on a bit of a public relations issue that XMLP
has: since most people use SOAP via a tool that understands WSDL, the
imminent release of SOAP 1.2 might seem a bit "underwhelming" to some until
there is a version of WSDL that supports it (and tools that support both).
The soapbuilders folks have put out 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/files/soap12WSDL.htm that
addresses this issue, and XMLP would like your expert advice on whether this
is something that would be a good idea to reference.

I beg WSA's indulgence if this is not exactly an architectural issue, but it
is important to the collective W3C Web services "story" in my humble
opinion.  Could we have a few minutes of the joint session next week to
discuss this? 
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:33:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:24 GMT