W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

concepts actions status

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:44:11 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200306172244.11544.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Hmm, I've just reviewed the post last call minutes.
I suspect I declared victory prematurely on concepts.

Here is a list of actions on me, since about february


Issue to check williams-02
=====================
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0128.html


Actions Done:
============

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0067.html
integrate value space of xml literal.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0199.html
update conepts document per xmlsch-06 decision

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0138.html
 jjc Make typed literal changes in concepts.
 jjc Inform I18N-WG of literals decision.
 jjc Updated concepts in lite of xmlsch-02 decision

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html
20030502#12 jjc update the Concepts WD with words after discussion with PatH 
and GK based on 2003Apr/0368.html text
(partial: have not had the discussion)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0217.html
jjc editorial changes reflecting not changing namespace URI
jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision pfps 22 pfps 23
jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision pfps 16
jjc update CONCEPTS in light of decision williams 01

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0053.html
ACTION: s to jjc to change text in concepts (context:
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/28-rdfcore-irc#T16-38-55) danc-01


Actions To Do:
============

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0199.html
jjc respond to commenter regarding xmlsch-05 decision
jjc [[[to be confirmed]]] respond to commenter

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0138.html
 jjc Review concepts to make consequential changes concerning typed literals
 jjc Provide anchor for rdf:XMLLiteral to Pat Hayes
 jjc Inform reagle-0[12] raisers of typed literals decision
 jjc To send response on xmlsch-01.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html
ACTION 20030502#13 jjc send formal responses to submitters after issues dealt 
with in 2003Apr/0368.html
20030502#12 jjc update the Concepts WD with words after discussion with PatH 
and GK based on 2003Apr/0368.html text
(have not had the discussion)
15:26:16 <db-scribe> bwm: to jjc, maybe need to point ot last para of 
explanation
15:26:29 <db-scribe> jjc: asks path for help rewording, editorially after 
decision
15:27:27 <bwm> ack gk
15:27:27 <Zakim> gk, you wanted to suggest a small tweak to jeremy's proposal
15:27:28 <Zakim> * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
15:27:36 <db-scribe> jjc points out rewording of first sentence
15:27:47 <db-scribe> gkgk: asks that it be made more inclusive as first 
setence, broader


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0097.html
2003-03-28#9
jjc update Concepts in light of XML Schema LC review editorial comments
ACTION: jeremy to add anchors to Concepts for def of canonicalistion, and for 
Impl Note

2003-03-21#9
jjc Check the details of the denotation of
XMLLiterals in section 3.1 of Semantics WD draft

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0138.html

ACTION 2003-03-21#6 jjc: review
  
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-rdf-graph
  in concepts WD after proposal to change in
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0114.html
  and circulate changes to the WG.

ACTION 2003-03-21#7 jjc: review 
  
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-blank-nodes
  in concepts WD after proposal to change in
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0114.html
  and propose change/non-change or further clarification to the WG.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0082.html
ACTION 2003-02-07#2 (jjc) ensure CONCEPTS is accurate on its use of
        subject/predicate/object terminology
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 16:44:17 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:55 EDT