W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc

From: Ramanathan Guha <rguha@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:24:19 -0700
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBED677D0.B274A997-ON88256D48.00700393-88256D48.00700D9F@us.ibm.com>
Can't we have a non-normative W3C Note that we refer to from the normative 
document?

guha






Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Sent by: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
06/17/2003 12:06 PM
 
        To:     w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Cut back RDFCore semantics doc

 


> removing the closure rules? I'm totally unconvinced
> and feeling completely lost... (again tears)
> better later publish an errata!

I have discussed this issue with HP colleagues and we support Jos's 
position.

While we obviously should not rule out cutting the closure rules, we 
should be 
convinced that it is necessary to do so 

Given that they are informative I would argue that even if we are not 100% 

convinced that they are right it is OK to go to Rec acknowleding the 
possibility of errata.

I probably would not be prepared to have a second last call just for the 
closure rules - but if that became the substance of the issue I would want 
to 
consult with my colleagues.

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 16:24:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:55 EDT