W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Minutes of SWBP WG 2006-02-06

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:03:19 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B6837@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

. . . are available at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html
and below in plain text.

David Booth

-------------------------------------------------------


   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                    Semantic Web Best Practices WG

6 Feb 2006

   [2]Agenda

      [2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0026.html

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Elisa Kendall, David Wood, Ralph Swick, Raphael Troncy,
          Fabien Gandon, Chris Halaschek, David Booth, Alistair Miles,
          Ben Adida, Guus Schreiber

   Regrets
          Jeremy Carroll, Jeff Pan, Libby Miller, Gary Ng,
          Brian_McBride, Deborah McGuinness

   Chair
          DWood

   Scribe
          DBooth

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Admin
         2. [6]2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14
         3. [7]2.2 OMG: ODM review
         4. [8]2.3 Other
         5. [9]3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair)
         6. [10]3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris)
         7. [11]3.3 WordNet (Aldo)
         8. [12]3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy)
         9. [13]3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB)
        10. [14]3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben)
        11. [15]3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby)
        12. [16]3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve)
        13. [17]3.9 Tutorial Page
        14. [18]3.10 SE - Software Engineering
        15. [19]3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation
     * [20]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

   <RalphS> Previous: 2006-01-23
   [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes

     [21] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes

   <scribe> Scribe: DBooth

Admin

   <dwood> Minutes from 12 Dec:
   [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014.
   html

     [22]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014.html

   <dwood> Minutes from 9 Jan:
   [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes

     [23] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes

   DWood: We didn't record accepting some of our previous minutes.

   <dwood> Minutes from 23 Jan:
   [24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes

     [24] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes

   <RalphS> [25]2005-12-12 record in HTML form

     [25] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html

   RESOLUTION: Accept minutes of 12 Dec, 9 Jan and 23 Jan.

   <dwood> PROPOSED next meeting 20 February 2006

   <RalphS> 20 Feb is a US Holiday

   RESOLUTION: next meeting 20 February 2006

   <RalphS> (I expect I will attend on the holiday if the WG meets
   then)

   <Zakim> TBaker, you wanted to propose Cookbook for Working Draft

   DWood: Other agenda for today?

   Ben: RDF/A Primer

   <benadida> yes!

   <TBaker> thank you!

2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14

   Alistair: DBooth had action to request clarification from TAG on the
   issue, and I had a VM TF action to ask whether 302 redirects are
   okay, so I drafted something boiling it down to whether hTTP
   responses are assertions. That also seemed like what was underlying
   a lot of discussion on the thread and whether it is okay to use a
   URI to name a person. I thought the httpRange-14 decision was to the
   effect that HTTP response is an assertion.
   ... Pat Hayes said he doesn't think this is a good idea to ask, that
   this is still a research question. DWood also commented.

   <RalphS> +1 to Pat Hayes' arguments being well worth reading

   <dwood> ackk dbooth

   <RalphS> DBooth: my view has shifted as a result of the email
   discussion

   <RalphS> ... I had felt that AWWW said that what the RDF/A Primer is
   doing should not be done

   <RalphS> ... but after reading Pat Hayes' and Jeremy's remarks I see
   there is a different interpretation of the TAG's writings

   <RalphS> ... I don't think it would be advisable to force the
   question right now

   <RalphS> DavidW: is there a different question that is worth asking
   the TAG?

   Ralph: I had been skeptical about whether it's worth asking the TAG
   to resolve anything, because I didn't feel it was likely they would
   answer quickly, so i'm confortable not pushing them on this.

   DWood: How about a purely SemWeb interpretation of the rang-14
   issue?

   Ralph: Not sure that's the best use of our time in the WG. But
   publishing the docs that we are publishing (RDF/A Primer, Apache
   Config Cookbook), both docs can touch on this question. i hope there
   will be several venues in which this issue is discussed (including
   this WG), but having an objective to resolve this in the next few
   months may be reaching too far.

   <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to say something about webarch

   Alistair: When I first read the TAG's httpRange-14 decision, the way
   I read it, I thought that the implied position was that an HTTP
   response is effectively an assertion, and I think quite a few other
   people read it that way as well. It could be useful to ask the
   question of the TAG. They could then say no, that isn't what we
   mean.

   <Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I think we can sidestep the issue

   <RalphS> DBooth: it's reasonable to send a question to the TAG

   <RalphS> ... with regard to our documents we can side-step the issue

   <RalphS> ... as it really comes down to the particular usage of an
   ontology; whether that particular usage runs into the issue

   Ralph: I'm okay with posing the question to the TAG. Don't know howw
   much background we need to supply on it.

   <RalphS> DBooth: my interpretation now is that an HTTP response is
   an assertion but that assertion is different from what I originally
   expected

   <RalphS> ... and perhaps also different from what Alistair  expected

   <RalphS> ... I don't want the TAG to think the WG is asking a
   question because we are waiting for a response but rather note that
   we ran into the question and found confusion in the area

   <Guus> suggest that DavidB takes this action

   <RalphS> Ralph: "we noted some ambiguity ..."

   <RalphS> ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the
   ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in
   [26]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01]

2.2 OMG: ODM review

   Elisa: No tools for QVT to validate. Delayed to April hoping for
   tools. Can drop Jeremy's action.

   <scribe> ACTION: [DROPPED] jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM
   [recorded in
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02]

2.3 Other

   Elisa: I did review the WSDL 2.0 --> RDF mapping review verbally.

   <scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping
   [recorded in
   [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03]

   <scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] Guus to arrange telecon between himself,
   Alistair and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4
   within 1 week  in
   [29]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ")
   [recorded in
   [30]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07]

     [29] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07

   <aliman> guus did you just say you sent a mail to pfwg to arrange a
   telecon?

   <Guus> wrt Action PFWG: it was rephrased as: "[NEW] ACTION: Guus to
   finish action of 2.4 within 1 week [recorded in
   [31]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02]"

     [31] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02

3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair)

   Alistair: Nothing to report

   Ralph: Still expecting to do another WD of SKOS?

   Alistair: Undecided.

3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris)

   Elisa: Had a call last week. Chris and Allen working with Ralph.
   Action is now mine to work with Ralph to put it into CVS.

   <scribe> ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc
   ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and
   Alan) [recorded in
   [32]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
   [CONTINUED]

     [32] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11

   <RalphS> [33]Elisa's report on action status for OEP actions

     [33]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0027.html

   <Guus> and i took the original action text for the agenda as it was
   clearer

   Elisa: Still outstanding: Deb needs to be sure all comments are
   captured from Galway mtg.
   ... (on integration note).

   <RalphS> (hmm, actually, 0027 doesn't have the detail I'd thought)

   <RalphS> [34][ALL/OEP] Minutes of 2006-01-30 Telecon Elisa
   2006-02-06]

     [34]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html

   Elisa: QCR note is being reconstructed after Chris's hard drive
   crash. Should be fine.

   <RalphS> (0042 has more action status detail)

   Guus: Voted on both notes alreadY?

   Elisa: Not sure. One minor change needed on QCR from Alan.

   <scribe> ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in
   [35]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08] [DONE]

     [35] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08

   <scribe> ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in
   [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [DONE]

     [36] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03

   <scribe> ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into
   revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in
   [37]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
   [PENDING]

     [37] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19

   <scribe> ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section
   [recorded in
   [38]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12]
   [PENDING]

     [38] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12

   Mike: Had a meeting where we made a detailed plan for the Note. I
   updated a new draft, much more detailed. Missing code examples.
   Chris Benzel will fill in code examples. Deb McGuiness will add an
   example at the end of the note.

   Raphael: Still the version of 3 Nov. Is there a new URI for the
   latest version?

   <aliman> what's the URI for the sem integration note?

   <scribe> ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem
   integration note [recorded in
   [39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10]

   Mike: You could review structure now or wait for complete draft.

   <RalphS> [40]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ points to
   [41]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/ (currently
   dated 3 Nov 2005)

     [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/
     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/

   <scribe> ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review Semantic
   Integration note
   [42]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
   [CONTINUED] [recorded in
   [43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11]

     [42] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15

   <scribe> ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of
   semantics in time ontology note [recorded in
   [44]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13]
   [CONTINUED]

     [44] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13

   Elisa: Evan pointed out an issue with the domain language.

   <scribe> ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in
   [45]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
   [CONTINUED]

     [45] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09

   <RalphS> action#17 is to get part-whole ready for publication

   Elisa: Regarding part/whole note, Chris is reconstructing it from
   hard drive crash.
   ... N-ary relations note is waiting on a new ordering pattern from
   Pat Hayes. Currently ordering of flight segments is implicit. Pat
   has the action to fix this; not sure of how to get it into the note.
   ... Discussion of additional potential notes. Chris has asked for a
   Fluents note.

   <RalphS> "Chris is working on a Fluents note, " --
   [46]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.
   html

     [46]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html

   Elisa: Been talking about units of measure, what will happen to OEP.
   Suggestion was to ask OEP to be rechartered. Chris might participate
   at a lower level. No conclusion but we thought it is a good idea for
   it to move forward.

   <RalphS> ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page
   [recorded in
   [47]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14]

   Guus: We only approved the Part/Whole note at the Galway F2F.

   <RalphS> ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f
   on WG home page [recorded in
   [48]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15]

3.3 WordNet (Aldo)

   Guus: Mark has made a new version. Handles all comments so far. Want
   reviewers.

   <RalphS> [49]RDF/OWL Representation of WordNet $Id:
   06-swbp-irc.txt,v 1.83 2006/02/06 19:36:11 swick Exp $

     [49]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html

   Guus: Main addition: Added intro for how to use it.

   <scribe> ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded
   in [50]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16]

   <RalphS> action- 16

   <scribe> ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded
   in [51]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17]

   <scribe> ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to
   the SWCG [recorded in
   [52]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.
   html] [DONE]

     [52]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html

3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy)

   <dwood> The editors hence propose publishing:

   <dwood>
   [53]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

     [53] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

   <dwood> as a WG Note.

   <Guus> URI for my WNET action:
   [54]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043.
   html

     [54]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043.html

   PROPOSED to move WD to WG Note:

   [55]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161.
   html

     [55]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161.html

   Ralph: Who reviewed?

   Guus: Evan and Ralph reviewed.

   Ralph: I'd have to re-read this before I can state an opinion.

   <RalphS>
   [56]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

     [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

   <scribe> ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note
   [57]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
   by next meeting [recorded in
   [58]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19]

     [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

   <TBaker>
   [59]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.
   html - see Section 3, "Response to reviews"

     [59]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html

3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB)

   <RalphS> [60][VM] Telecon Tuesday (today) 15:00 UTC

     [60]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html

   Tom: Discussed suggestions made by reviewers. Want to propose the
   draft for publication as WD.

   <TBaker>
   [61]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01
   -18/

     [61]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01-18/

   Tom: I believe we addressed major points made by reviewers.

   <dwood>
   [62]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.
   html

     [62]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html

   DWood: Reviewers were Andreas and DBooth.

   <aliman> no amendments are being proposed

   Guus: I propose we put this on agenda for next time.

   <RalphS> DBooth: are we proposing to remove some words regarding
   httpRange-14 from the cookbook?

   <RalphS> ... the intent of my action was to propose some words on
   how to select which type of URI to use, which I think is still
   relevant

   <RalphS> ... I recall doing some work on these words but might not
   have posted to the list

   <RalphS> ... I think words can be written that avoid controversy

   <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to mention scope

   <RalphS> DBooth: I think it is relevant to say something about what
   kind of URI to use

   <RalphS> Alistair: the TF summarized the scope of the document
   [reads Introduction]

   <RalphS> ... the document scope is primarily for existing
   vocabularies

   <RalphS> ... though Ralph did include a few words about choosing
   names

   <RalphS> ... if David wants to propose some new text I'd be glad to
   look

   <RalphS> DavidW: DBooth is free to propose words, the TF decides
   whether or not to include the proposed words before asking the WG to
   publish

   <RalphS> Alistair: in that case, I ask the WG to publish the draft
   as-is and we consider any proposed new words in a future update

   <RalphS> DBooth: I'm comfortable with that. It sounds as though the
   TF carefully bounded its scope to avoid the question of picking URIs
   but I feel this is such an obvious question that it should be
   covered

   <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask DBooth if these additional words
   should hold a first WD

   <RalphS> Tom: can we take the resolution to advance the cookbook to
   Working Draft on the next telecon, please

   Tom: I'd like to advance this to WD on 20 Feb. Would like any
   proposed text before 14 Feb.

   <scribe> ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14
   Feb [recorded in
   [63]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20]

   <scribe> ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document
   by 14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in
   [64]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21]

3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben)

   Ben: Lots of discussion regarding WebArch issues. On mailing list 2
   wks ago I made a mistake and forgot to include a section that Mark
   had written. Lots of positive feedback on them. Wanted to check
   withh the WG that we're still okay to go to WD.

   <Guus> we have voted, so it is basicaly editor's discretion

   <Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I'm okay going okay with first WD

   Guus: We already voted on it.
   ... No problem in going forward with it.

   <scribe> ACTION: [DONE] ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's
   [recorded in
   [65]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22]

   CONFIRMED: Document is ready to publish as a WD.

   <scribe> ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in
   [66]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23]

3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby)

   (skipped)

3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve)

   (skippeed)

   <scribe> ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are
   editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication
   process if none [recorded in
   [67]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30] [DONE]

     [67] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30

3.9 Tutorial Page

   (skipped)

3.10 SE - Software Engineering

   <scribe> ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE
   Primer [recorded in
   [68]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24]
   [PENDING]

     [68] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24

   <scribe> ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded in
   [69]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
   [PENDING]

     [69] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23

3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation

   Jacco: Want to move the MM doc to public WD. Reviewers: Mike and
   Guus.

   DWood: Has Jane Hunter contributed?

   Jacco: She contributed a first draft of example. I asked her to
   revise it and have not heard back.

   <raphael> "Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version
   available at
   [70]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
   (v1.142)

     [70]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html

   <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask about Jane Hunter's contribution

   Jacco: Chris Catton also promised to send a use case soon-ish.

   Ralph: Jane Hunter has not completed the invited expert materials.

   Jacco: She told me she had.

   Ralph: There's a form she needs to complete.

   Jacco: I think her name can be removed from the list of
   contributors.
   ... I'll forward Ralph her email about this.

   <dwood> Jacco, Please note that in Section 5.4, s/Apollo 7 Saturn
   shuttle launch/Apollo 7 Saturn rocket launch/

   <scribe> ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are
   addressed by end of this week [recorded in
   [71]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27]

   PROPOSED: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval of
   changes.

   "Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version available at
   [72]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
   (v1.142)

     [72]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html

   Mike: it isn't linked from the BP web page.

   RESOLUTION: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval
   of changes.

   Ralph: Do we have permission to use all the NASA and other images?

   <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask a copyright question

   Jacco: Yes.

   <chalaschek> yes the nasa image is ok

   <aliman> bye

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the
   ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in
   [73]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01]
   [NEW] ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14 Feb
   [recorded in
   [74]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20]
   [NEW] ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded in
   [75]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17]
   [NEW] ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded in
   [76]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16]
   [NEW] ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem integration
   note [recorded in
   [77]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10]
   [NEW] ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are
   addressed by end of this week [recorded in
   [78]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27]
   [NEW] ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page
   [recorded in
   [79]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
   [NEW] ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note
   [80]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
   by next meeting [recorded in
   [81]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
   [NEW] ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f on
   WG home page [recorded in
   [82]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
   [NEW] ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in
   [83]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
   [NEW] ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document by
   14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in
   [84]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21]

     [80] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/

   [PENDING] ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section
   [recorded in
   [85]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc
   ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and
   Alan) [recorded in
   [86]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of
   semantics in time ontology note [recorded in
   [87]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to arrange telecon between himself, Alistair
   and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4 within 1 week
   in [88]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ")
   [recorded in
   [89]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into
   revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in
   [90]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in
   [91]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded
   in [92]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
   [PENDING] ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE
   Primer [recorded in
   [93]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24]
   [PENDING] ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review
   Semantic Integration note
   [94]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
   [recorded in
   [95]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11]

     [85] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12
     [86] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11
     [87] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13
     [88] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02
     [89] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07
     [90] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19
     [91] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09
     [92] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23
     [93] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24
     [94] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15

   [DONE] ACTION: ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's [recorded
   in [96]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22]
   [DONE] ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in
   [97]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08]
   [DONE] ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in
   [98]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
   [DONE] ACTION: Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping [recorded in
   [99]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
   [DONE] ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to
   the SWCG [recorded in
   [100]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144
   .html]
   [DONE] ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are
   editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication
   process if none [recorded in
   [101]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30]

     [97] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08
     [98] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03
    [100]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html
    [101] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30

   [DROPPED] ACTION: jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM [recorded in
   [102]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [103]scribe.perl version 1.122
    ([104]CVS log)
    $Date: 2006/02/07 03:34:53 $

    [103]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
    [104] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:06:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:46 UTC