public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2016 by thread

Issue 93 Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 30 March)

shapes-ISSUE-142 (loose terminology): SHACL spec is too loose with its uses of terminology [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 30 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 31 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 30 March)

external contributions? Alessandro Bollini (Friday, 25 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 24 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 25 March)

schema.org and SHACL Holger Knublauch (Friday, 25 March)

disjointness between property constraint and inverse property constraint and default value type in the core Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 24 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 24 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 23 March)

implementing paths for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 23 March)

implementation of core SHACL (using proposed syntax) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 22 March)

shapes-ISSUE-141 (Mixed ranges): How to represent mixed datatype-or-class ranges [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 22 March)

Editorial clean up around constraints Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 22 March)

shapes-ISSUE-140 (Individual validation): SHACL needs to support validation of individual nodes [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 21 March)

Face to face meeting? Holger Knublauch (Saturday, 19 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 17 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 18 March)

How to make progress on syntax and metamodel? Holger Knublauch (Friday, 18 March)

shapes-ISSUE-139 (Universal applicability): Can all constraint properties be applied in all scenarios? [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 18 March)

shapes-ISSUE-138 (Property constraints as lists): Should property constraints use rdf:Lists? [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 18 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 17 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 17 March)

shapes-ISSUE-137 (bartvanleeuwen): Missing constraint for language tag [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 14 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 10 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 14 March)

Beware: Daylight saving time in effect in the US Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 14 March)

shapes-ISSUE-136 (Property pair names): Can we clarify the names of property pair constraint types? [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 13 March)

rdf language tag contraints Bart van Leeuwen (Sunday, 13 March)

New SHACL co-editor Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 11 March)

ISSUE-133: Proposals on multi-occurrence Holger Knublauch (Friday, 11 March)

refactored syntax document available Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 11 March)

shapes-ISSUE-135 (and/or syntactic sugar): Should sh:and/sh:or/sh:not/sh:valueShape support constraints too? [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 March)

shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 March)

Selected problems with Proposal 4 Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 10 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 10 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 9 March)

ACTION: ericP to send proposal for sh:Stem in response to ISSUE-80 Eric Prud'hommeaux (Wednesday, 9 March)

ISSUE-68: Updated definition Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 9 March)

shapes-ISSUE-133 (syntax): syntax simplification and regularization [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 8 March)

shapes-ISSUE-132 (sh:predicate in constraints): sh:predicate is used in many constraints but not always available [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 7 March)

shapes-ISSUE-131 (sh:hasShape ill defined): The definition of sh:hasShape has errors and holes [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 7 March)

recursion in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 7 March)

shapes-ISSUE-130 (rdf dataset assumption): SHACL should not assume that the data graph is in an RDF dataset [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 7 March)

shapes-ISSUE-129 (existential constraints): Existential constraints should be consistent [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 7 March)

comments on SHACL 3 March editors draft Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 6 March)

shapes-ISSUE-128 (rdfs:range): sh:defaultValueType is rdfs:range [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 6 March)

shapes-ISSUE-127 (sh:TemplateScope undefined): sh:TemplateScope is mentioned but not defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 6 March)

shapes-ISSUE-126 (sh:TemplateConstraint undefined): sh:TemplateConstraint is used in examples but not defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 6 March)

shapes-ISSUE-125 (sh:NodeConstraint missing): sh:NodeConstraint is mentioned but never defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 6 March)

shapes-ISSUE-124 (sh:group): sh:group is only mentioned in examples [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 6 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 3 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 3 March)

shapes-ACTION-36: Send proposal for sh:stem in response to issue-80 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 March)

bringing ShEx and Shacl closer Iovka Boneva (Thursday, 3 March)

SHACL recursion based on SPARQL (idea) Dimitris Kontokostas (Thursday, 3 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 3 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 3 March)

issue-95 metamodel simplifications Eric Prud'hommeaux (Wednesday, 2 March)

probable regrets Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 2 March)

Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 1 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:34:39 UTC