- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:06:30 +0100
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 22 September 2017 09:06:57 UTC
Achim Berndzen <achim.berndzen@xml-project.com> writes: > Yes, I completely agree with you that we also have to deal with > pipeline calls (I am not sure about dynamic pipeline with p:eval). For > called pipelines the locator expression is a bit more complex, but I > think we could do something with > > /p:declare-step/foo:caller[1]/p:declare-step/.... or > /p:declare-step/foo:caller[1]/p:library/p:declare-step .... Like I said yesterday, I don’t really like the idea of using XPath expressions over the original pipeline source as the locator mechanism. But even if we do, I think it would be a mistake to “reach through” the call to a step. I suppose it might be possible to have different traces in different calls, but I wouldn’t swear to it. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Friday, 22 September 2017 09:06:57 UTC