Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Thinking about injection

Using XPaths into the original pipeline source will not work for implicit
connections.  It might be possible to specify an intermediate (static) XML
model, with implicit connections expanded, as being the context in which
locator XPaths are evaluated.


On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> Achim Berndzen <achim.berndzen@xml-project.com> writes:
> > Yes, I completely agree with you that we also have to deal with
> > pipeline calls (I am not sure about dynamic pipeline with p:eval). For
> > called pipelines the locator expression is a bit more complex, but I
> > think we could do something with
> >
> > /p:declare-step/foo:caller[1]/p:declare-step/.... or
> > /p:declare-step/foo:caller[1]/p:library/p:declare-step ....
>
> Like I said yesterday, I don’t really like the idea of using XPath
> expressions over the original pipeline source as the locator
> mechanism. But even if we do, I think it would be a mistake to “reach
> through” the call to a step.
>
> I suppose it might be possible to have different traces in different
> calls, but I wouldn’t swear to it.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> Phone: +1 512 761 6676
> www.marklogic.com
>



-- 
LambdaWerk GmbH
Oranienburger Straße 87/89
10178 Berlin
Phone: +49 30 555 7335 0
Fax: +49 30 555 7335 99

HRB 169991 B Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
USt-ID: DE301399951
Geschäftsführer:  Hans Hübner

http://lambdawerk.com/