Re: custom non-atomic steps?

Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com> writes:
> Has custom non-atomic steps (steps where you can provide one or more
> subpipelines upon invocation) been discussed as a possibility in
> XProc v.Next? It would for instance allow us to define our own
> custom syntactic sugar.

I don't think it's been discussed. It's not clear how to describe a
custom step in a standard way.

If you want to do it anyway, in XML Calabash, the UntilUnchanged step is
an example of how to do it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com