- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:02:05 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
wondering if adding a way to set context to a p:group would get this kind of behavior for us with a plain old p:declare-step ? probably worth discussing. J On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com> writes: >> Has custom non-atomic steps (steps where you can provide one or more >> subpipelines upon invocation) been discussed as a possibility in >> XProc v.Next? It would for instance allow us to define our own >> custom syntactic sugar. > > I don't think it's been discussed. It's not clear how to describe a > custom step in a standard way. > > If you want to do it anyway, in XML Calabash, the UntilUnchanged step is > an example of how to do it. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > Phone: +1 512 761 6676 > www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 11:02:36 UTC