Re: custom non-atomic steps?

wondering if adding a way to set context to a p:group would get this
kind of behavior for us with a plain old p:declare-step ?

probably worth discussing.

J

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com> writes:
>> Has custom non-atomic steps (steps where you can provide one or more
>> subpipelines upon invocation) been discussed as a possibility in
>> XProc v.Next? It would for instance allow us to define our own
>> custom syntactic sugar.
>
> I don't think it's been discussed. It's not clear how to describe a
> custom step in a standard way.
>
> If you want to do it anyway, in XML Calabash, the UntilUnchanged step is
> an example of how to do it.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> Phone: +1 512 761 6676
> www.marklogic.com

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 11:02:36 UTC