- From: Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:53:07 +0200
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 12:53:54 UTC
Has custom non-atomic steps (steps where you can provide one or more subpipelines upon invocation) been discussed as a possibility in XProc v.Next? It would for instance allow us to define our own custom syntactic sugar. Jostein
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 12:53:54 UTC