- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:35:34 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 19 December 2008 20:36:15 UTC
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > Just note how long winded it is to do such a simple thing Norm? > I'm less sure how clear the use case is for it though. I guess it's a little bit long-winded, but you only have to do it once and stick it in a library and then it's as simple as <ex:set-value .../> The WG has tried to avoid introducing new steps when their behavior can be easily fabricated with existing steps. Not that I'll claim that was a hard-and-fast rule. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Linux. Because rebooting is for http://nwalsh.com/ | hardware upgrades.
Received on Friday, 19 December 2008 20:36:15 UTC