- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:37:02 +0100
- To: <boris@codesynthesis.com>, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Cc: <paul@xmlhelpline.com>, <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>, <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3c.org>, <lists@jeffrafter.com>
Do people have good experiences using Substitution Groups in conjunction with Databinding tools? Paul -----Original Message----- From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris@codesynthesis.com] Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 7:38 AM To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au Cc: paul@xmlhelpline.com; David_E3@VERIFONE.com; mike@saxonica.com; xmlschema-dev@w3c.org; lists@jeffrafter.com; Downey,P,Paul,XSB2 R Subject: Re: Xml Schema profile Hi, Simon.Cox@csiro.au <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> writes: > Please do not labour under the impression that substitution groups are a > corner of the spec that rarely gets visited. I was also somewhat surprised seeing this assumption. I did a quick search on our XML Schema repository which brought up the following well-known schemas besides the opengeospatiol.org's ones (GML, etc.): OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) / http://oval.mitre.org FpML (Financial products Markup Language) / http://www.fpml.org COLLADA (COLLAborative Design Activity) / http://www.collada.org HR-XML / http://www.hr-xml.org hth, -boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 07:38:37 UTC