- From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:12:14 +0200
- To: paul.downey@bt.com
- Cc: boris@codesynthesis.com, Simon.Cox@csiro.au, paul@xmlhelpline.com, David_E3@VERIFONE.com, mike@saxonica.com, xmlschema-dev@w3c.org, lists@jeffrafter.com
Hi Paul, paul.downey@bt.com <paul.downey@bt.com> writes: > Do people have good experiences using Substitution Groups > in conjunction with Databinding tools? I can only speak for the tool that we are developing. We've had support for substitution groups (along with the xsi:type dynamic typing) for a while now. I also know from the messages on our mailing list that people are successfully using our tool on schemas that use substitution groups extensively (e.g., OVAL, FpML). >From the XML data binding implementer's perspective I can also say that it is fairly straightforward to support substitution groups once you have support for xsi:type. hth, -boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 12:17:00 UTC