- From: David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:37:35 -0500
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I have the following complexType coded:
<xs:complexType name="ProcessingOutcomeMessage">
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="DescriptionMessage" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element ref="MessageReasonCode" minOccurs="0" />
</xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="DescriptionMessage" type="Description"
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element ref="MessageReasonCode"
type="MessageReasonCode" minOccurs="1" />
<xs:element ref="ApplicationReasonCode"
type="ApplicationReasonCode" minOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation
source="http://www.starstandard.org">Contains a software specific
application reason code.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
It validates fine if using Xerces J 2.7.0 or XSV 2.5. However,
Microsoft's XML, XML Spy 2006 SP2, and Oxygen complain about
DescriptionMessage being defined twice, even though they are in seperate
sequence groups.
What I want to do is require DescriptionMessage, MeassageReasonCode if
there is an ApplicationReasonCode, if there isn't an
ApplicationReasonCode, then DescriptionMessage and MessageReasonCode are
optional.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 04:16:39 UTC