- From: Olivier Lefevre <lefevrol@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:55:32 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
>>any DTD-focused newsgroup or mailing list. > This list isn't DTD-focused, it is XML Schema-focused. Sorry, somehow I truncated my message when I copied it. What I meant to write is that I didn't find and DTD-focused forum, so I hoped this one would do, as DTDs are often used as a poor man's schema. > Doing this in XML Schema is no problem. So, one workaround would be to convert the DTD to a schema and make that chnage in the schema? Do you know if parsers that use catalogs will let you substitute a schema for a DTD without complaining? They are different things. > It's a strange historical relic of SGML than enumerated > values defined in a DTD have to be valid names. The reason > is that SGML (when the moon is right) allows the quotes on > an attribute value to be omitted. I guess that means there is no way to allow empty attributes if the corresponding DTD declaration is enumerated, right? Thanks again very much, -- O.L.
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:01:09 UTC