- From: Alessandro Triglia <sandro@mclink.it>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
- To: sandygao@ca.ibm.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sandy Gao [mailto:sandygao@ca.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 16:35 > To: Alessandro Triglia > Cc: 'ML-xml-schema-dev' > Subject: RE: min occurs > > > > Hi. Trying to reply to both your messages in the thread. > > > I would like to reply to Sandy that ... > > As you can probably tell, I was just moving issues around > instead of raising them. So I'd rather you say "reply to bug > 2222". :-) > > > Why wasn't the {max occur} property of particles just > specified as a *positive* integer? Am I missing something obvious? > > Did you mean "Either a positive integer or unbounded"? (We do > need the "unbounded" value.) Yes. > Then I agree: "positive" makes > more sense than "non-negative" because we never allow 0. And > we can kill that 2.2 clause about {max occurs} must >= 1. Exactly. > > It's up to you to either add your comments to bug 2222 or > open a new one [1] if you think they are sufficiently different. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=XML%20Schema > > > The second issue above (beginning with "I also noticed the > following...") is > > not reported in Sandy's bug report. > > You are right. I vaguely remember seeing this comment before, > but couldn't find it anywhere. Feel free to open a new bug. Thank you, Alessandro > > Thanks, > Sandy Gao > XML Parser Development, IBM Canada > (1-905) 413-3255 > sandygao@ca.ibm.com >
Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 12:44:05 UTC