Re: Advice, please: Restricting wild cards in anonymous types

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grimaldi, Linda L. writes:

> I am working with a "standard" schema that allows <xs:any,
> namespace="##other" ... in its complex types.  The problem I am having
> is that, since the complex types are anonymous, I don't seem to be able
> to restrict (or extend) them in the usual way.  Is there any way around
> this issue, some other way to restrict the xs:any to a specific element
> that is local to my own namespace?

Named or not, the only way to _change_ what the content model of the
containing element allows is by redefining a type -- in your case, the
first named type definition which itself contains the element
declaration with the anonymous type definition.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDRjLvkjnJixAXWBoRAtA3AJ9+nb7jVwYuVTVn1Oic+UcbdPedhACfegy/
IyN4eIc2ZSuxEgBkcNjI6nU=
=gUB3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 08:34:53 UTC