- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:36:40 +0100
- To: "'Kasimier Buchcik'" <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>, "'<\"ht@inf.ed.ac.uk\"'" <"Henry S. Thompson"@mail.firmenpost.de>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > Does this mean as well, that if a schema document (A) with an > existing > target namespace includes a schema document (B) with no target > namespace, which, in turn, includes a schema document (C), the target > namespace of (B) will still be 'absent' when the constraints for > including of (C) are applied? IOW, does this chameleon-effect > touch the > first level of includes only? > My reading is that the components derived from C are copied into the schema corresponding to B with no change in namespace, but when the components are then copied into A, the namespace is changed regardless whether they originated from B or C. Michael Kay
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2004 09:36:44 UTC