- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:59:30 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: "'Kasimier Buchcik'" <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>, "'<\"ht@inf.ed.ac.uk\"'" <"Henry S. Thompson"@mail.firmenpost.de>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> writes:
>> Does this mean as well, that if a schema document (A) with an
>> existing target namespace includes a schema document (B) with no
>> target namespace, which, in turn, includes a schema document (C),
>> the target namespace of (B) will still be 'absent' when the
>> constraints for including of (C) are applied? IOW, does this
>> chameleon-effect touch the first level of includes only?
>>
>
> My reading is that the components derived from C are copied into the schema
> corresponding to B with no change in namespace, but when the components are
> then copied into A, the namespace is changed regardless whether they
> originated from B or C.
That's my reading also.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2004 09:59:36 UTC