- From: Volker Zink <Volker.Zink@porabo.ch>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:41:48 +0200
- To: George Cristian Bina <george@sync.ro>
- CC: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@epfl.ch>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <41235C9C.7060401@porabo.ch>
You are right. I just replied in FIFO-order. It took some time to reply because i have work with higher priority too. Sorry for "disregarding" your post, but i would have replied even if you wouldnt have sent your reminder :-) You directly pointed to whats wrong with the schema. Thats what i was looking for (i just included the elementFormDefault and its now without errors). Thanks a lot. Really. Volker Zink George Cristian Bina schrieb: > Volker, > > I explained you the problem in my previous post. > If you just add elementFormDefault="qualified" to your schema the > instance document will be validated without problems. > > > <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > xmlns:plem="grips://xml.recom-verlag.de/comm/plem" > targetNamespace="grips://xml.recom-verlag.de/comm/plem" > elementFormDefault="qualified" > ... > > Hope that helps, > George > ----------------------------------------------- > George Cristian Bina > <oXygen/> XML Editor & XSLT Editor/Debugger > http://www.oxygenxml.com > > > Volker Zink wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> 1. The Error mentioned was produced by the w3.org-Validator at >> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv. Normally i use the validator >> in my programming environment (VisualWorks Smalltalk), but i trust >> the one at w3.org more, and it has more detailed error >> messages/warnings. >> >> 2. If i remove the "grips://xml.recom-verlag.de/comm/plem"-namespace >> completely (including "plem:"-prefixes), i get following result >> ---- >> PLEMGrips-Schema-Fall.xsd:6:5: Invalid: Undefined type >> {http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}:FallImportExport referenced as >> type definition of fallImportExport >> Problems with the schema-validity of the target >> --- >> >> I don't write an own validator. It just seems to me, that the >> validator in VisualWorks has other results as the w3.org-validator, >> so i want to know, whats really correct, and why. >> As a programmer i use namespaces everyday. But XML-namespaces are a >> bit strange to me compared to the namespaces in VisualWorks >> Smalltalk. But probably because in XML its all about syntax, in >> Smalltalk its about objects (classes). One object is in one >> namespace. Thats quite easy. >> >> Volker > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 13:42:36 UTC