- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@bononia.it>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 14:44:35 +0200
- To: XML Schema Dev ML <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I'm really puzzled about the Schema "valid restriction" rules about the
facets regarding limits.
This is a brief summary of the rules found on the specifications:
[ I hope the notation is clear "f" is a generic set of facets, new and
old are respectively the new set of facets you're using to restrict and
the set of facets of the type you're restricting ]
maxInclusive paragraph
- f.minInclusive <= f.maxInclusive
-
* not (new.maxExclusive >= old.maxExclusive)
** not (new.maxInclusive > old.maxInclusive)
* not (new.minExclusive <= old.minExclusive)
* not (new.minInclusive < old.minInclusive)
maxExclusive paragraph
- not both max{Inclusive,Exclusive}
- f.minExclusive <= f.maxExclusive
-
** not (new.maxExclusive > old.maxExclusive)
* not (new.maxInclusive > old.maxInclusive)
* not (new.minExclusive <= old.minExclusive)
* not (new.minInclusive <= old.minInclusive)
minExclusive paragraph
- not both min{Inclusive,Exclusive}
- f.minExclusive < f.maxInclusive
-
* not (new.maxExclusive >= old.maxExclusive)
* not (new.maxInclusive > old.maxInclusive)
** not (new.minExclusive < old.minExclusive)
* not (new.minInclusive < old.minInclusive)
minInclusive paragraph
- f.minInclusive < f.maxExclusive
-
* not (new.maxExclusive >= old.maxExclusive)
* not (new.maxInclusive > old.maxInclusive)
* not (new.minExclusive <= old.minExclusive)
** not (new.minInclusive < old.minInclusive)
Does this make sense?
If I have understood correctly, the limit I'm restricting (marked with
"**") has to be strictly less or greater than the previous one. Ok.
But now:
1) why I've to check also the other limits?
2) (assuming that exists an answer for the previous question)
why this checks are not consistent?
e.g.
- if I'm restricting maxInclusive the recommandation specify to
check
new.minInclusive < old.minInclusive
- if I'm restriction maxExclusive the recommandation specify to
check
new.minInclusive <= old.minInclusive
The errata seems not to mention this issues ...
Thanks in advance.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
" I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2003 08:46:22 UTC