W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > February 2003

Re: validation issue for extensible schema - XMLSpy issue ?

From: Paul Kiel <paul@hr-xml.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:29:27 -0500
Message-ID: <002f01c2d467$c5234c20$6401a8c0@pkiel2>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "Laurent Le Meur" <laurent.lemeur@afp.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

I do report problems, although have increasingly relied on connections to
report instead of official points of contact.  I realize it would be better
to post these more widely.

You know what would be good is a list of all the major parsers' official bug
report place (email, url, newsgroup, etc) in one simple post.

I may cull the official W3C schema site for just the places to report bugs
when i get a chance.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
To: "Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org>
Cc: "Laurent Le Meur" <laurent.lemeur@afp.com>; <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: validation issue for extensible schema - XMLSpy issue ?

> "Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org> writes:
> > I have found that the processContent feature is inconsitently
implemented in
> > various products, so we ended up removing it from our ANY definitions.
> > was easier to predict what a parser would do without it than with it.
> This is of course a serious issue -- I hope, as with all other
> inter-op problems, you notified the vendors of the problem -- this is
> the only way such things get fixed.
> ht
> --
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
>                       Half-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>     Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
>      URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 15:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:09 UTC