- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:23:27 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi Martin, Martin Duerst wrote: > Hello Eric, > > I'm not sure what was intended, but I would go for only those > dates that have the actual number. This would also be much closer > to what the ISO 8601, which says something like 'a day with > number 31' (i.e. only one day, underspecified, rather than > all days, throughout the ages). I am just trying to understand the rec to be able to explain it :=) ... I am also worried that different schema processor may continue to produce different results which is one of the most serious threats I see on W3C XML Schema today! This being said, --31 could be used to specify the last day of the months. There are probably some real world use cases. For instance, my telephone company sends me a bill on each month the same day I have subscribed. I don't think they bill their customers who have subscribed on a 31th only 7 times a year... > Either way, it's not of much use, because there are very few things > that really work that way. The safest use for gDay is to store > a part of a date when you take it appart. But it's not a good > idea to take a date apart, because it's possible to translate > dates to other calendar systems for user display, whereas it's > not possible for something like gDay. > > So the shortest summary is 'keep your hands away from it'. gDay shouldn't have been defined in this case! Thanks Eric > > Regards, Martin. > -- Rendez-vous a` Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2001 02:23:05 UTC