- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:00:11 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote: > Also, keep in mind that even when you use a timezone, it is a construction > in the lexical form that is not distinguishable separately in the value. > The difference between > > 1PM GMT-5 > and 6PM GMT (I know these aren't the right lexical forms) > > is much like the difference between: > > 1E+2 > and 100.0 > > in float. The two sets of forms represent the same values, respectively, > and will compare equal. Yes, allowing to say 1PM without mentioning any timezone is like allowing to say 1 without specifying the order of magnitude and saying that it's 1E"something undetermined". Considering that 1PM == 1PM is implying that there is an "implicit application timezone" common to a schema and all its instance documents. I am not discussing the design decision, but think that it should be better documented... > I was against this design choice for date/time, as > I felt that users would expect timezones to be significant if supplied. I > lost, and it's certainly too late to change now. Even when timezones are > supplied, they cannot be seen directly in the value space. Yes and I think that it's a third (and different) issue! The first two issues being this implicit timezone and the fact that symbolic timezones (BST, EST, PST, ...) are not directly supported. Thanks Eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 10:59:44 UTC