- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:00:11 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote:
> Also, keep in mind that even when you use a timezone, it is a construction
> in the lexical form that is not distinguishable separately in the value.
> The difference between
>
> 1PM GMT-5
> and 6PM GMT (I know these aren't the right lexical forms)
>
> is much like the difference between:
>
> 1E+2
> and 100.0
>
> in float. The two sets of forms represent the same values, respectively,
> and will compare equal.
Yes, allowing to say 1PM without mentioning any timezone is like
allowing to say 1 without specifying the order of magnitude and saying
that it's 1E"something undetermined".
Considering that 1PM == 1PM is implying that there is an "implicit
application timezone" common to a schema and all its instance documents.
I am not discussing the design decision, but think that it should be
better documented...
> I was against this design choice for date/time, as
> I felt that users would expect timezones to be significant if supplied. I
> lost, and it's certainly too late to change now. Even when timezones are
> supplied, they cannot be seen directly in the value space.
Yes and I think that it's a third (and different) issue!
The first two issues being this implicit timezone and the fact that
symbolic timezones (BST, EST, PST, ...) are not directly supported.
Thanks
Eric
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 10:59:44 UTC