- From: Stanley Guan <Stanley.Guan@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:16:45 -0700
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3BD721AD.FE3CED21@oracle.com>
What's the procedure of posting errata or suspected errata information? Should the following description in XML Representation Summary: complexType Element Information Item be changed from: 2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those of the ·complete wildcard·, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional union of the {namespace constraint} of the ·effective wildcard· and of the ·base wildcard·, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (§3.10.6). to: 2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those of the ·complete wildcard·, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional union of the {namespace constraint} of the ·complete wildcard· and of the ·base wildcard·, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (§3.10.6). -Stanley Guan > The first public set of errata [1] were just approved by the WG last > week and published today! This one isn't in there yet as its final > wording hasn't been agreed. > > There's a member-only tabulation of outstanding issues, some of which > will turn in to errata, which you may want to consult, linked from the > WG homepage [2] (member-only). > > ht > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Schemas.html > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 16:17:18 UTC