- From: Stanley Guan <Stanley.Guan@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:16:45 -0700
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3BD721AD.FE3CED21@oracle.com>
What's the procedure of posting errata or suspected errata information?
Should the following description in XML Representation Summary: complexType
Element Information Item be changed from:
2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process
contents} and
{annotation} are those of the ·complete
wildcard·, and whose
{namespace constraint} is the intensional
union of the
{namespace constraint} of the ·effective
wildcard· and of the
·base wildcard·, as defined in Attribute
Wildcard Union
(§3.10.6).
to:
2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process
contents} and
{annotation} are those of the ·complete
wildcard·, and whose
{namespace constraint} is the intensional
union of the
{namespace constraint} of the ·complete
wildcard· and of the
·base wildcard·, as defined in Attribute
Wildcard Union
(§3.10.6).
-Stanley Guan
> The first public set of errata [1] were just approved by the WG last
> week and published today! This one isn't in there yet as its final
> wording hasn't been agreed.
>
> There's a member-only tabulation of outstanding issues, some of which
> will turn in to errata, which you may want to consult, linked from the
> WG homepage [2] (member-only).
>
> ht
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Schemas.html
> --
> Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
> W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
> 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
> Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 16:17:18 UTC