- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 17:36:08 +0100
- To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi Eric, > From my reading of the rec, both a memberTypes attribute and > embedded local simple type definitions can be used in a single > derivation by union and I'd like to know in which relative order > they will be evaluated when it is the case. In Section 4.1.2.3 (Derivation by union) of the XML Schema Datatypes spec, {member type definitions} is defined as: The sequence of Simple Type Definition components resolved to by the items in the actual value of the memberTypes [attribute], if any, in order, followed by the Simple Type Definition components resolved to by the <simpleType> [children], if any, in order. So the memberTypes attribute first, embedded simple type definitions second, I think. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 12:36:12 UTC