- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:38:56 +0100
- To: vdv@dyomedea.com
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> The combination of W3C XML Schema and Schematron (or RELAX NG, W3C XML > Schema datatypes and Schematron as being currently discussed on other > lists) seems like a good way to leverage on each language for what it is > strong at. yes I agree, but what I meant that I hope to be able to offer people a DTD, a relaxng shema, a w3c, schema, a schematron, and a hand tuned XSL stylesheet that validates all kinds of extra openmath-specific stuff. And probably ooffer a web based form that will do all of these at once if so desired. Given that, I'm not sure that embedding a bit of the schematron into the w3c schema adds a lot. Having said that, I'd characterise "this element takes exactly one attribute" as somthing that belongs in your level 1 (even though dtd and W3C Schema can't say that) logically I think relaxng/trex approach of trying to be able to speak of attributes and child elements in similar ways would have been a good design principle for a schema language. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 09:42:46 UTC