- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:51:15 -0500
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: costello@mitre.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Roger Costello writes: >> Is this dangling ref legal? As far as I know, the requirement that such a reference result is expressed at the level of schema components, not schema documents. In general, it is possible that your processor has a component for the element foo that will correctly resolve the reference. For example, this might occur if the schema in your e-mail was in fact included by another, and if the "outer" one had the declaration. Of course, if the only schema information available to your processor is the schema document that you supply, then the component for foo is missing and there is indeed a violation of the constraints on schema components. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 10:05:20 UTC