xml-names-issues@w3.org from October to December 1998 by author

Al Gilman

• one more wording suggestion (Saturday, 31 October)
• editorial comments to namespaces draft (Saturday, 31 October)

Bryan Cooper

• Re: Default Namespace should be clearly documented ... (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Default Namespace should be clearly documented and supported by specific <TAG> type (Monday, 30 November)
• Default Namespace should be clearly documented and supported by specific <TAG> type (Sunday, 29 November)

Charles Frankston

• RE: Spec question (Saturday, 5 December)

Charles Kung

• namespace proposal (Wednesday, 9 December)

Chris Lilley

• CSS inaccuracy in Namespaces PR (Monday, 30 November)

David Brownell

• PR-xml-names-19981117 (Wednesday, 18 November)

Martin J. Duerst

• Martin's comments on Namespaces in XML (Monday, 5 October)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Wrong reference to RFC (Sunday, 6 December)

Peter Linss

• Spec question (Friday, 4 December)

Rick Jelliffe

• Namespaces are a triple (Thursday, 19 November)

Tim Bray

• Re: namespace proposal (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: CSS inaccuracy in Namespaces PR (Monday, 30 November)

Yoshiyuki Kitahara

• Section 5.1 Namespace scoping example. (Tuesday, 24 November)

Yves Provencher

• Photographe corespondant work (Monday, 26 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 8 December 1998 22:43:35 UTC