- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 09:49:17 -0600
- To: xml-names-issues@w3.org
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, David Brownell <db@argon.eng.sun.com>
I am satisified with the wording of the 9/16 version; in fact, I think it is an improvement. I would lose the word "such" in "If such a markup" but consider that trivial and not worthy of delaying the release. While there may be merit for changing this to a "goals" sections, the time has long past for such significant editorial changes. Dave Hollander > At 04:25 PM 8/16/98 +0700, James Clark wrote: > >David Brownell wrote: > >> The "motivation" (why not clearly defined "goals"?) in the XML > >> namespace draft defines combining "markup from multiple independent > >> sources" as needing namespace collision avoidance mechanisms. The > ... > >I think the use of the word "markup" in section 1 is deeply confusing. > > I would suggest > >something like: > ... > >"We envisage the use of XML documents that draw their element types and > >attributes from multiple vocabularies (collections of element types and > >attributes with defined semantics) > > I think James is right and have made changes to this effect. I have > not, however, done away entirely with the word "markup", nor have I > introduced the notion of "vocabularies". > > -Tim > >
Received on Monday, 14 September 1998 11:54:36 UTC