- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 07:35:35 -0700
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com> (by way of Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>), xml-names-issues@w3.org
At 10:35 AM 9/11/98 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote: >Although some have argued that notations, entities and >processing instructions do not require namespace-qualification, >I disagree strongly with that assertion. ... >I submit the following ... >Name parts >In XML, the fully-qualified name of any XML object is >considered to be composed of multiple parts, including: ... Murray, your poits are plausible, but I have to say that I think the WG chewed them over pretty thoroughly with a result that's reflected in the spec. Reading your note, it wasn't obvious to me which, if any, of your points constituted new information/arguments. Could you highlight that? -Tim
Received on Monday, 14 September 1998 10:32:46 UTC