W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-names-issues@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: Namespaces spec is incomplete

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 07:35:35 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com> (by way of Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>), xml-names-issues@w3.org
At 10:35 AM 9/11/98 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote:
>Although some have argued that notations, entities and
>processing instructions do not require namespace-qualification,
>I disagree strongly with that assertion.
>I submit the following ...
>Name parts
>In XML, the fully-qualified name of any XML object is 
>considered to be composed of multiple parts, including:
Murray, your poits are plausible, but I have to say that
I think the WG chewed them over pretty thoroughly with 
a result that's reflected in the spec.  Reading your
note, it wasn't obvious to me which, if any, of your points
constituted new information/arguments. Could you highlight
that?  -Tim
Received on Monday, 14 September 1998 10:32:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:38 UTC