At 10:35 AM 9/11/98 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote: >Although some have argued that notations, entities and >processing instructions do not require namespace-qualification, >I disagree strongly with that assertion. ... >I submit the following ... >Name parts >In XML, the fully-qualified name of any XML object is >considered to be composed of multiple parts, including: ... Murray, your poits are plausible, but I have to say that I think the WG chewed them over pretty thoroughly with a result that's reflected in the spec. Reading your note, it wasn't obvious to me which, if any, of your points constituted new information/arguments. Could you highlight that? -TimReceived on Monday, 14 September 1998 10:32:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:38 UTC