- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 10:02:44 -0600
- To: db@argon.eng.sun.com (David Brownell), xml-names-issues@w3.org
I believe we can defer to the XML spec for error levels. While it could be clearer now, the real answer is to wait for the ns spec to be folded into the XML spec. Until then, the ns spec only expands on the names production of the XML spec with the same error expectations, Dave Hollander > At 01:11 AM 8/16/98 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > >Error handling isn't well enough specified in the current XML namespaces > >draft. If this is truly expected to be incorporated into an upcoming XML > >revision (1.1 or so) this must be defined using the same terminology > >(warning, error, fatal error). > > I don't agree with David's conclusion, but he has characterized the > symptom accurately. I have just gone through and reworded all discussion > of errors simply to talk about things either being "conformant with > this specification" or not. -Tim > >
Received on Monday, 14 September 1998 12:07:41 UTC