- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 20:23:04 -0700
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, David Brownell <db@argon.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Cc: xml-names-issues@w3.org
At 04:25 PM 8/16/98 +0700, James Clark wrote: >David Brownell wrote: >> The "motivation" (why not clearly defined "goals"?) in the XML >> namespace draft defines combining "markup from multiple independent >> sources" as needing namespace collision avoidance mechanisms. The ... >I think the use of the word "markup" in section 1 is deeply confusing. > I would suggest >something like: ... >"We envisage the use of XML documents that draw their element types and >attributes from multiple vocabularies (collections of element types and >attributes with defined semantics) I think James is right and have made changes to this effect. I have not, however, done away entirely with the word "markup", nor have I introduced the notion of "vocabularies". -Tim
Received on Thursday, 10 September 1998 23:22:24 UTC