- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:37:28 -0500
- To: "'xml-encryption@w3.org'" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 11:37:33 UTC
My intent was to use the hash function from the DigestMethod element. Seems to me the way to clarify this is to make it mandatory. See attached suggested change. Thanks, Donald Subject: Re: rsa/oaep Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:20:12 -0500 From: Jiandong Guo <jguo@phaos.com> To: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com> Cc: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>, xml-encryption@w3.org Takeshi Imamura wrote: > I interpret "mgf1p" as MGF1 with the hash function specified by the > DigestMethod element. This is not that obvious from the context of the document. My first impression is that the default (MGF1 with SHA1) would be used. Should we make this more clear in case it will cause confusion when we interop with each other? Jiandong Guo Phaos Technology
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 11:37:33 UTC