Re: Alternative to reverse MEP: reverse HTTP binding

At 04:23 AM 2003-05-16, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
>It was not clear to me after having read the document that you were indeed 
>NOT creating any new MEP. When you list the MEPs supported by the reverse 
>binding, I think it would be worth indicating their URIs, so that there is 
>no ambiguity about which MEP you are effectively talking about.
>
>(It is still unclear to me now whether your "response" MEP is the SOAP 
>Response MEP, or some other MEP.)
>
>Jean-Jacques.

+1.

Paul 

Received on Friday, 16 May 2003 08:54:22 UTC