- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 07:02:49 -0500
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
typo: s/me/may/ also, haven't we been calling this the "default" HTTP binding? [1]. Shouldn't we be consistent in calling it that? Cheers, Chris Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > Done :) > > Henrik > > >><proposed> >>"The purpose of the SOAP HTTP binding is to provide a binding >>of SOAP to >>HTTP. It is important to note that use of the SOAP HTTP binding is >>optional and that nothing precludes the specification of different >>bindings to other protocols, or indeed to define other >>bindings to HTTP. >>Because of the optionality of using the SOAP HTTP binding, it is NOT a >>requirement to implement it as part of a SOAP node. A node >>that does correctly >>and completely implement the HTTP binding me to be said to >>"conform to the >>SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding."" >></proposed> >> > >
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 07:03:45 UTC