RE: Clarifying optionality of HTTP binding

• From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:41:11 -0800
• To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
• Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D06DEDE2E@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Done :)

Henrik 

><proposed>
>"The purpose of the SOAP HTTP binding is to provide a binding 
>of SOAP to
>HTTP. It is important to note that use of the SOAP HTTP binding is
>optional and that nothing precludes the specification of different
>bindings to other protocols, or indeed to define other 
>bindings to HTTP.
>Because of the optionality of using the SOAP HTTP binding, it is NOT a
>requirement to implement it as part of a SOAP node.  A node 
>that does correctly 
>and completely implement the HTTP binding me to be said to 
>"conform to the 
>SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding.""
></proposed>

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 19:41:44 UTC