Re: Rework on SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Section 2 and 3

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>; "Noah Mendelsohn"
<noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: Rework on SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Section 2 and 3


> +1, tremendous job!
>
> Two questions:
>
>    * Section 3.1.1, bullet 1, "then the element information item is said
to
>      represent"
>      Should it be read as "this element information item" (i.e. "the edge
>      element information item") or "the node element information item"?

If clause one applies the EII represent the edge *AND* the node. Perhaps I
should change the second 'the EII' to 'that EII'

>    * Section 3.1.2, Unicode
>      Didn't we say recently UTF-8 or UTF-16?

Use the Infoset Luke! The infoset defines everything as Unicode. UTF-8/16 is
a serialization detail. And we only specified UTF-8/16 as a *minimum* for
the HTTP binding.

>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> Tim Ewald wrote:
>
> > I love this new version, especially the language in section 2 that
> > clarifies the roll of the SOAP data model relative to XSD. I also like
> > the clarifications in section 3 about the precise meaning of xsi:type in
> > the context of the SOAP encoding.
>

Received on Friday, 15 March 2002 06:05:26 UTC