- From: Mike Taylor <mike@tecc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:10:06 +0100 (BST)
- To: barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca
- CC: azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk, Theo.vanVeen@kb.nl, Kevin.Gladwell@bl.uk, www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:06:05 -0400 > From: Shuh Barbara <barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca> > > Rob's right. The modular design of the Z39.50 attribute > architecture allows for the use of multiple attribute sets in one > query. Yup. Not only that, but Rob's observation applies to CQL too, which after all intends to model the Type-1 query quite closely. You'd just use CQL qualifiers with the appropriate util, bib2 or dclib qualifiers, mixed and matched as required. Something like -- util:creator,bib2:personal,dclib:agentDetail=Kernighan (Which, OK, is not a great example, but illustrates the combination of attributes from different sets.) BTW., as I understand it, CQL is not bound to use different prefixes for attributes from different sets, although that's one nice way to set things up: the CQL people are at liberty to define the generic "bib" CQL qualifier set which includes all of the above attributes, and use it like this: bib:creator,bib:personal,bib:agentDetail=Kernighan Or indeed to define a single qualifier which encompasses all three attributes in one fell swoop: bib:personalAgentCreator=Kernighan Whether they _should_ do this is a whole nother question, of course. And perhaps one that belongs on the ZING list rather than the ZIG list.) _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "The Pope claimed he'd been wrong in the past; this was a big surprise" -- Sting, "Jeremiah Blues"
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 09:10:09 UTC