- From: Shuh Barbara <barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:06:05 -0400
- To: "'Robert Sanderson'" <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>, Theo van Veen <Theo.vanVeen@kb.nl>
- Cc: Kevin.Gladwell@bl.uk, www-zig@w3.org
Rob's right.
The modular design of the Z39.50 attribute architecture allows for the use
of multiple attribute sets in one query.  If there are aspects of DC-Lib
profiled data that go beyond that which is carried in MARC-like databases,
then there could be a DC-Lib Attribute Set, if there is a body of interested
persons willing to go through the exercise of developing such a set... (You
may note that, at the present time, I don't see myself as part of that
group;-)
Barb
______________________
Barbara Shuh
Library Network Specialist
National Library of Canada
Phone:  (613) 995-1701  Fax:  (613) 943-1939
E-mail:  barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Theo van Veen
Cc: Kevin.Gladwell@bl.uk; Shuh Barbara; www-zig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Betr.: RE: Bib-2 and the DC-Lib
> The interoperability problem is that: "when the DC-lib community find
> searches which cannot be created in BIB2 they have to make their own
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> attribute set, DC-Lib-1 or whatever, which allows for these extra
> searches."
How is that an interoperability problem?
There isn't two ways to do a search, there's the BIB2 way for all that 
BIB2 defines and the extras are defined in DC-Lib-1.
There is no overlap, therefore there is no interop problem?
Rob
-- 
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk)
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Twin Cathedrals:  telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.              WWW:  http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 12:05:55 UTC