- From: Shuh Barbara <barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:06:05 -0400
- To: "'Robert Sanderson'" <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>, Theo van Veen <Theo.vanVeen@kb.nl>
- Cc: Kevin.Gladwell@bl.uk, www-zig@w3.org
Rob's right. The modular design of the Z39.50 attribute architecture allows for the use of multiple attribute sets in one query. If there are aspects of DC-Lib profiled data that go beyond that which is carried in MARC-like databases, then there could be a DC-Lib Attribute Set, if there is a body of interested persons willing to go through the exercise of developing such a set... (You may note that, at the present time, I don't see myself as part of that group;-) Barb ______________________ Barbara Shuh Library Network Specialist National Library of Canada Phone: (613) 995-1701 Fax: (613) 943-1939 E-mail: barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca -----Original Message----- From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:33 AM To: Theo van Veen Cc: Kevin.Gladwell@bl.uk; Shuh Barbara; www-zig@w3.org Subject: Re: Betr.: RE: Bib-2 and the DC-Lib > The interoperability problem is that: "when the DC-lib community find > searches which cannot be created in BIB2 they have to make their own ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > attribute set, DC-Lib-1 or whatever, which allows for these extra > searches." How is that an interoperability problem? There isn't two ways to do a search, there's the BIB2 way for all that BIB2 defines and the extras are defined in DC-Lib-1. There is no overlap, therefore there is no interop problem? Rob -- ,'/:. Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk) ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777 ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/ I L L U M I N A T I
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 12:05:55 UTC