- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:57:41 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6541
Summary: Assertions and in-scope functions
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
The current rules for assertions state that the whole of the XPath 2.0 syntax
must be implemented, but they leave the set of functions in the function
library entirely implementation-defined (3.13.6.2 clause 2.2.8).
This seems to leave an enormous interoperability hole. Users, especially
industry bodies producing schemas for an industry, need to have confidence that
their schemas will be usable across a range of schema processors. To enable
them to use assertions while achieving this level of interoperability, they
need some kind of assurance about the minumum set of functions that will be
available.
We could define the minimum set to be (a) all the constructor functions for
built in types plus (b) all the functions defined in the F+O namespace for
XPath 2.0. Or we could define a smaller set by doing some fairly arbitrary
cherry-picking from that set. But a minimum set that is empty is fairly
unusable.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2009 19:57:49 UTC