- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:57:41 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6541 Summary: Assertions and in-scope functions Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com The current rules for assertions state that the whole of the XPath 2.0 syntax must be implemented, but they leave the set of functions in the function library entirely implementation-defined (3.13.6.2 clause 2.2.8). This seems to leave an enormous interoperability hole. Users, especially industry bodies producing schemas for an industry, need to have confidence that their schemas will be usable across a range of schema processors. To enable them to use assertions while achieving this level of interoperability, they need some kind of assurance about the minumum set of functions that will be available. We could define the minimum set to be (a) all the constructor functions for built in types plus (b) all the functions defined in the F+O namespace for XPath 2.0. Or we could define a smaller set by doing some fairly arbitrary cherry-picking from that set. But a minimum set that is empty is fairly unusable. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2009 19:57:49 UTC